twivideo.net Twivideo.net

   
Twitter動画保存ランキング | TWIVIDEO

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Twivideo.net?

• Twivideo.net ranks #84,359 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Twivideo.net?

0.007392% of global Internet users visit Twivideo.net

How many people visit Twivideo.net each day?

• Twivideo.net receives approximately 364.4K visitors and 1,558,118 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Twivideo.net receive most of its visitors from?

• Twivideo.net is mostly visited by people located in Japan,Korea, Republic of,United States.

How much Twivideo.net can earn?

• Twivideo.net should earn about $735.94/day from advertising revenue.

What is Twivideo.net estimated value?

• Estimated value of Twivideo.net is $743,210.53.

What IP addresses does Twivideo.net resolve to?

• Twivideo.net resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3035::6815:640, 172.67.134.143.

Where are Twivideo.net servers located in?

• Twivideo.net has servers located in United States.

twivideo.net Profile

Title:Twitter動画保存ランキング | TWIVIDEO Description:TWIVIDEOは、ツイッターから動画やGIFをダウンロードして保存するための無料オンラインツール、Twitter Video Downloaderです。
Tags:
Category:Arts and Entertainment / Animation and Comics

What technologies does twivideo.net use?

These are the technologies used at twivideo.net. twivideo.net has a total of 10 technologies installed in 6 different categories.

twivideo.net Traffic Analysis

Twivideo.net is ranked #84,359 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 364.4K visitors daily, generating a total of 1.6M pageviews. This equates to about 11M monthly visitors. Twivideo.net traffic has decreased by 2.4% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors364.4K
10.54%
Monthly Visits11M
2.4%
Pages per Visit4.28
6.59%
Visit duration03:53
3.15%
Bounce Rate56.99%
8.76%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
364,422
Monthly Visits:
11,041,987
Pages per Visit:
4.28
Daily Pageviews:
1,558,118
Avg. visit duration:
03:53
Bounce rate:
56.99%
Global Reach:
0.007392%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
26,980,133
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
3,042,492
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
10,718,290
HypeRank:
84,359
SEMrush Rank:
258,179
SimilarWeb Rank:
5,056
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
81.78%
Referral:
1.38%
Search:
15.97%
Social:
0.84%
Paid:
0.03%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
6.90%
Mobile:
93.10%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

11M
DEC
11.3M
JAN
11M
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Japan 94.09%
 
Korea, Republic of 2.24%
 
United States 1.25%
 
Taiwan 0.61%
 
Malaysia 0.41%

Where do visitors go on twivideo.net?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
twivideo.net
100.00%100.00%1.0

Which sites are competitors to twivideo.net?

Websites similar to twivideo.net are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 149 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with twivideo.net in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
38
Bing Index:
46

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  twivideo.net
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  258,179
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  440
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  6,729
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $2,546.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $735.9 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $22.1K and annual gross revenue of approximately $268.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $743.2K.

How much would twivideo.net make?

Daily Revenue:
$735.94
Monthly Revenue:
$22,078.20
Yearly Revenue:
$268,618.10
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Japan 1,466,095$527.79
 
United States 19,464$94.01
 
Korea, Republic of 34,860$20.92
 
Taiwan 9,502$2.19
 
Malaysia 6,336$1.84

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$34.09
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1,022.67
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$12,442.43
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
50,908
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
1,527,236
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
18,581,372

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 3,503$16.92
 
Japan 43,983$15.83
 
Korea, Republic of 1,394$0.84
 
Taiwan 1,520$0.35
 
Malaysia 507$0.15

How much is twivideo.net worth?

Website Value:
$743.2K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
twivideo.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
twivideo.net
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
twivideo.net
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is twivideo.net hosted?

Twivideo.net may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.

How fast does twivideo.net load?

The average loading time of twivideo.net is 463 ms. The Desktop speed index is 97 and mobile speed index is 84.
Average Load Time:
463 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

97
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)77ms 13% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 81% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 81%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)660ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)50ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 78% 16% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)77ms 19% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 19% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 76% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 76%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)713ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 88% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)50ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 79% 16% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 16% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 1.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

84
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 13% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)584ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 14% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)177ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)584ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)177ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 80% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 16% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.7s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint 3.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Time to Interactive 7.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 2.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Speed Index 3.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Does twivideo.net use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on twivideo.net are reduced by 68%.
twivideo.net use br compression.
Original size: 17.26 KB
Compressed size: 5.41 KB
File reduced by: 11.86 KB (68%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. twivideo.net has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. twivideo.net supports HTTPS.
 twivideo.net supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: twivideo.net
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 3 14:29:20 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 1 15:25:47 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 twivideo.net supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 00:17:19 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
cache-control: public, max-age=120
expires: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 00:19:19 GMT
vary: User-Agent,Accept-Encoding
set-cookie: is_valid_param=c8668f59922353d1a5804f84b9797333; expires=Sun, 23 Mar 2025 00:27:19 GMT; Max-Age=600; path=/
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=ks6l6d0p22oserstuje351b00m; path=/
last-modified: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 00:17:19 GMT
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=AcSwpmmOarszYfC7OBCFu5zv4R1sMTDPz%2FulcbvMJqlnR6%2F5vIQLVry2gsey%2BckTjNQq4H5s2Z%2BFYpNUb9%2F78NiIcCU2vYc8P4FkhxC9A4GUnMqwJcphtD9eEXGAOzo%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 9249bebfaf9550d9-ORD
content-encoding: br
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=7308&min_rtt=2227&rtt_var=10600&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3411&recv_bytes=892&delivery_rate=1300404&cwnd=217&unsent_bytes=0&cid=2bb37c90b5bd8066&ts=456&x=0"

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3031::ac43:868f 248
AAAA 2606:4700:3035::6815:640 248
A 172.67.134.143 248
A 104.21.6.64 248
NS adam.ns.cloudflare.com 172748
NS ali.ns.cloudflare.com 172748
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on August 20, 2020 and will expire on August 20, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar TUCOWS, INC.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 17, 2024.
Domain Created:
2020-08-20
Domain Expires:
2025-08-20
Domain Updated:
2024-09-17
Domain Age:
4 years 30 days
Domain Registrar:
TUCOWS, INC.
Domain Owner:
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: TWIVIDEO.NET
Registry Domain ID: 2554298843_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://tucowsdomains.com
Updated Date: 2024-09-17T08:18:10
Creation Date: 2020-08-20T03:33:35
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2025-08-20T03:33:35
Registrar: TUCOWS, INC.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: 
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: Charlestown
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: KN
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: https://tieredaccess.com/contact/6d8c0141-667a-4a2e-9c5d-085eb1759541
Registry Admin ID: 
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registry Tech ID: 
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Name Server: ali.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: adam.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://icann.org/wicf
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-23T00:18:10Z