tubsexer.pics Tubsexer.pics

   
Free *** *** Videos - TubSexer - *** Movies - Home of Videos ***

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Tubsexer.pics?

• Tubsexer.pics ranks #368,928 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Tubsexer.pics?

• 7.27E-5% of global Internet users visit Tubsexer.pics

How many people visit Tubsexer.pics each day?

• Tubsexer.pics receives approximately 3.6K visitors and 7,091 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Tubsexer.pics receive most of its visitors from?

• Tubsexer.pics is mostly visited by people located in United States,India,Germany.

How much Tubsexer.pics can earn?

• Tubsexer.pics should earn about $20.95/day from advertising revenue.

What is Tubsexer.pics estimated value?

• Estimated value of Tubsexer.pics is $18,745.69.

What IP addresses does Tubsexer.pics resolve to?

• Tubsexer.pics resolves to the IP addresses 2a05:44c0:1:3f::2, 185.73.220.197.

Where are Tubsexer.pics servers located in?

• Tubsexer.pics has servers located in Meppel, Drenthe, 7941, The Netherlands.

tubsexer.pics Profile

Title:Free *** *** Videos - TubSexer - *** Movies - Home of Videos *** Description:TubSexer brings you new free *** videos every day. Watch great *** *** videos and pornos at the best free *** and *** tube site on the web.
Tags:
porn videos
sex
hd
free porn
free
porn
porn tube
porno
sex videos
Category:Adult / Adult
Edit Site Info

What technologies does tubsexer.pics use?

These are the technologies used at tubsexer.pics. tubsexer.pics has a total of 8 technologies installed in 8 different categories.
CDN
Google Hosted Libraries Google Hosted Libraries
Security
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Analytics
Liveinternet Liveinternet
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
Programming Languages
PHP PHP

tubsexer.pics Traffic Analysis

Tubsexer.pics is ranked #368,928 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 3.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 7.1K pageviews. This equates to about 108.7K monthly visitors. Tubsexer.pics traffic has decreased by 20.81% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors3.6K
7%
Monthly Visits108.7K
20.81%
Pages per Visit1.98
31.11%
Visit duration01:17
30.29%
Bounce Rate64.67%
19.82%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
3,586
Monthly Visits:
108,656
Pages per Visit:
1.98
Daily Pageviews:
7,091
Avg. visit duration:
01:17
Bounce rate:
64.67%
Global Reach:
7.27E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
132,032
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
102,616
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
105,460
HypeRank:
368,928
SEMrush Rank:
17,016,053
SimilarWeb Rank:
368,928
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
27.90%
Referral:
4.79%
Search:
64.40%
Social:
0.39%
Paid:
2.52%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
89.84%
Mobile:
10.16%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

114.1K
DEC
137.2K
JAN
108.7K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 19.59%
 
India 12.10%
 
Germany 11.29%
 
France 9.16%
 
Brazil 7.34%

Which sites are competitors to tubsexer.pics?

Websites similar to tubsexer.pics are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 117 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with tubsexer.pics in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  tubsexer.pics
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  17,016,053
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  8
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $21 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $628.5 and annual gross revenue of approximately $7.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $18.7K.

How much would tubsexer.pics make?

Daily Revenue:
$20.95
Monthly Revenue:
$628.50
Yearly Revenue:
$7,646.75
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 1,389$6.71
 
Germany 801$1.12
 
Brazil 520$0.69
 
France 649$0.38
 
India 858$0.33

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1.71
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$51.22
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$623.16
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
825
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
24,754
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
301,174

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 250$1.21
 
Germany 232$0.33
 
India 240$0.09
 
Brazil 31$0.04
 
France 71$0.04

How much is tubsexer.pics worth?

Website Value:
$18.7K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
tubsexer.pics
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
tubsexer.pics
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
tubsexer.pics
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is tubsexer.pics hosted? ▼

Tubsexer.pics may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a05:44c0:1:3f::2, 185.73.220.197
ASN:
AS32338 
ISP:
Hostiserver Ltd 
Server Location:
Meppel
Drenthe, DR
7941
The Netherlands, NL
 

Other sites hosted on 185.73.220.197

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does tubsexer.pics load? ▼

The average loading time of tubsexer.pics is 746 ms. The Desktop speed index is 94 and mobile speed index is 76.
Average Load Time:
746 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)3ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)668ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 77% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 7% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)32ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.9s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)38ms 35% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 35% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 14% 49% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 49%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)740ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 77% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 85% 8% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)65ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 80% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 1.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

76
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)498ms 77% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 8% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)900ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 89% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)141ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)22ms 53% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 53% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 27% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 19%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)605ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 87% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)217ms 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 73% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 11%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 88% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Speed Index 3.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 4.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 3.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint 4.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric

Does tubsexer.pics use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on tubsexer.pics are reduced by 84%.
tubsexer.pics use gzip compression.
Original size: 82.55 KB
Compressed size: 13.06 KB
File reduced by: 69.48 KB (84%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE
Child Safety Reputations:
  10
Child Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. tubsexer.pics supports HTTPS.
 tubsexer.pics supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: rt.tubsexer.pics
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Mar 15 09:18:49 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 13 09:18:48 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E5
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 tubsexer.pics supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:51:42 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
content-length: 0
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
pragma: no-cache
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=uchnl72b9p9h71n0k2abihopn4lmtmn3; path=/; domain=.tubsexer.pics; secure; SameSite=None
location: https://rt.tubsexer.pics/
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000; 

HTTP/2 200 
server: nginx
date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:51:42 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
pragma: no-cache
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=nf5u9lhjqpli4c4d7oop3no7k1brafv7; path=/; domain=.rt.tubsexer.pics; secure; SameSite=None
set-cookie: kt_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fhypestat.com; expires=Sun, 23-Mar-2025 12:51:42 GMT; Max-Age=86400; path=/; domain=.rt.tubsexer.pics; secure; SameSite=None
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000; 
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2a05:44c0:1:3f::2 1739
A 185.73.220.197 1739
NS pdns1.registrar-servers.com 3540
NS pdns2.registrar-servers.com 3540
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information.
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: tubsexer.pics

>>> This name is not available for registration:

>>> Tld not supported by this registry interface

>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-22T12:52:41.327Z