torbt.cz Torbt.cz

   
TorBT - *** and Magnet Links Search Engine - TorBT

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Torbt.cz?

• Torbt.cz ranks #775,357 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Torbt.cz?

• 2.06E-5% of global Internet users visit Torbt.cz

How many people visit Torbt.cz each day?

• Torbt.cz receives approximately 1K visitors and 4,410 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Torbt.cz receive most of its visitors from?

• Torbt.cz is mostly visited by people located in United States,Russian Federation,Canada.

How much Torbt.cz can earn?

• Torbt.cz should earn about $16.96/day from advertising revenue.

What is Torbt.cz estimated value?

• Estimated value of Torbt.cz is $16,233.72.

What IP addresses does Torbt.cz resolve to?

• Torbt.cz resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3032::6815:4434, 172.67.186.222.

Where are Torbt.cz servers located in?

• Torbt.cz has servers located in United States.

torbt.cz Profile

Title:TorBT - *** and Magnet Links Search Engine - TorBT
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / File Sharing and Hosting
Edit Site Info

What technologies does torbt.cz use?

These are the technologies used at torbt.cz. torbt.cz has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
UI frameworks
Pure CSS Pure CSS

torbt.cz Traffic Analysis

Torbt.cz is ranked #775,357 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 1K visitors daily, generating a total of 4.4K pageviews. This equates to about 30.8K monthly visitors. Torbt.cz traffic has decreased by 44.75% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors1K
41.48%
Monthly Visits30.8K
44.75%
Pages per Visit4.34
2.95%
Visit duration02:00
26.87%
Bounce Rate46.75%
14.41%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
1,017
Monthly Visits:
30,815
Pages per Visit:
4.34
Daily Pageviews:
4,410
Avg. visit duration:
02:00
Bounce rate:
46.75%
Global Reach:
2.06E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
40,083
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
24,614
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
30,197
HypeRank:
775,357
SEMrush Rank:
6,339,748
SimilarWeb Rank:
775,357
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
41.33%
Referral:
17.72%
Search:
40.95%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
50.38%
Mobile:
49.62%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

91K
JAN
55.8K
FEB
30.8K
MAR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 52.75%
 
Russian Federation 11.06%
 
Canada 6.45%
 
Japan 4.84%
 
Czech Republic 4.70%

Which sites are competitors to torbt.cz?

Websites similar to torbt.cz are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 125 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with torbt.cz in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
155,000

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  torbt.cz
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  6,339,748
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  4
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  20
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $17 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $508.8 and annual gross revenue of approximately $6.2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $16.2K.

How much would torbt.cz make?

Daily Revenue:
$16.96
Monthly Revenue:
$508.80
Yearly Revenue:
$6,190.40
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 2,326$11.24
 
Canada 285$1.72
 
Russian Federation 488$0.20
 
Czech Republic 207$0.10
 
Japan 214$0.08

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$2.48
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$74.28
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$903.72
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
546
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
16,387
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
199,379

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 419$2.02
 
Canada 71$0.43
 
Russian Federation 29$0.01
 
Czech Republic 21$0.01
 
Japan 6$0.00

How much is torbt.cz worth?

Website Value:
$16.2K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
torbt.cz
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
torbt.cz
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
torbt.cz
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is torbt.cz hosted? ▼

Torbt.cz may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:3032::6815:4434, 172.67.186.222
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 172.67.186.222

How fast does torbt.cz load? ▼

The average loading time of torbt.cz is 535 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 93.
Average Load Time:
535 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.0s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 63% 27% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.4s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 83% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)36ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 94% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 46% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 46% 40% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 75% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 6% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)42ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 12% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 12% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

93
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 50% 40% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)126ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 50% 40% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 40% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 78% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)126ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 85% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 83% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Contentful Paint 1.6 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Speed Index 1.8 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 1.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.6 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Does torbt.cz use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on torbt.cz are reduced by 64%.
torbt.cz use br compression.
Original size: 3.26 KB
Compressed size: 1.15 KB
File reduced by: 2.1 KB (64%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. torbt.cz supports HTTPS.
 torbt.cz supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: torbt.cz
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Mar 5 22:11:48 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 3 23:10:30 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 torbt.cz supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 06:42:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
server: cloudflare
vary: Accept-Encoding
cache-control: max-age=3600
cdn-cache-control: max-age=3600
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
content-encoding: br
set-cookie: adszone-2=0; Path=/; Expires=Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:42:23 GMT
set-cookie: adszone-1=0; Path=/; Expires=Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:42:23 GMT
cf-ray: 9309766dfd1ee98e-ORD
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:3037::ac43:bade 253
AAAA 2606:4700:3032::6815:4434 253
A 172.67.186.222 253
A 104.21.68.52 253
NS dolly.ns.cloudflare.com 3553
NS quentin.ns.cloudflare.com 3553
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 21, 2023 and will expire on September 21, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar REG-GRANSY. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on September 21, 2023.
Domain Created:
2023-09-21
Domain Expires:
2025-09-21
Domain Updated:
2023-09-21
Domain Age:
1 years 10 months 27 days
Domain Registrar:
REG-GRANSY
Domain Owner:
Arthur Simth
WhoIs:
 

%  (c) 2006-2021 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.
% 
% Intended use of supplied data and information
% 
% Data contained in the domain name register, as well as information
% supplied through public information services of CZ.NIC association,
% are appointed only for purposes connected with Internet network
% administration and operation, or for the purpose of legal or other
% similar proceedings, in process as regards a matter connected
% particularly with holding and using a concrete domain name.
% 
% Full text available at:
% http://www.nic.cz/page/306/intended-use-of-supplied-data-and-information/
% 
% See also a search service at http://www.nic.cz/whois/
% 
% 
% Whoisd Server Version: 3.15.0
% Timestamp: Tue Apr 15 08:43:08 2025

domain:       torbt.cz
registrant:   SUB-931560
nsset:        SUB-20230921090101
registrar:    REG-GRANSY
registered:   21.09.2023 08:37:02
changed:      21.09.2023 09:01:02
expire:       21.09.2025

contact:      SUB-931560
name:         Arthur Simth
address:      POB 3561, Geneva Place, Waterfront Drive
address:      Road Town
address:      VG1110
address:      VG
registrar:    REG-GRANSY
created:      21.09.2023 08:37:01

nsset:        SUB-20230921090101
nserver:      dolly.ns.cloudflare.com 
nserver:      quentin.ns.cloudflare.com 
tech-c:       SUB-931560
registrar:    REG-GRANSY
created:      21.09.2023 09:01:01
changed:      11.12.2024 14:49:45