nofile.org Nofile.org

   
Cloud storage and data transfer services ~ pixeldrain

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Nofile.org?

• Nofile.org ranks #91,709 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Nofile.org?

• 0.0002848% of global Internet users visit Nofile.org

How many people visit Nofile.org each day?

• Nofile.org receives approximately 14K visitors and 403,546 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Nofile.org receive most of its visitors from?

• Nofile.org is mostly visited by people located in United States,Germany,United Kingdom.

How much Nofile.org can earn?

• Nofile.org should earn about $1,397.74/day from advertising revenue.

What is Nofile.org estimated value?

• Estimated value of Nofile.org is $1,698,381.75.

What IP addresses does Nofile.org resolve to?

• Nofile.org resolves to the IP addresses 46.166.189.98.

Where are Nofile.org servers located in?

• Nofile.org has servers located in Amsterdam, North Holland, 1091, The Netherlands.

nofile.org Profile

Title:Cloud storage and data transfer services ~ pixeldrain Description:Pixeldrain is a file transfer service, you can upload any file and you will be given a shareable link right away. pixeldrain also supports previews for images, videos, audio, PDFs and much more.
Tags:
send documents
simple
large document
pdf
professional file transfer
audio upload
free file transfer
pdf sharing
text file upload
document sharing
pdf transfer
audio sharing
file hosting
music sharing
video hosting
video sharing
huge file
free file upload
music upload
free file hosting
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / File Sharing and Hosting
Edit Site Info

What technologies does nofile.org use?

These are the technologies used at nofile.org. nofile.org has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Security
HSTS HSTS
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph

nofile.org Traffic Analysis

Nofile.org is ranked #91,709 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 14K visitors daily, generating a total of 403.5K pageviews. This equates to about 425.4K monthly visitors. Nofile.org traffic has decreased by 12.36% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors14K
12.61%
Monthly Visits425.4K
12.36%
Pages per Visit28.75
11.42%
Visit duration06:04
9.17%
Bounce Rate29.91%
205.48%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
14,038
Monthly Visits:
425,351
Pages per Visit:
28.75
Daily Pageviews:
403,546
Avg. visit duration:
06:04
Bounce rate:
29.91%
Global Reach:
0.0002848%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,293,461
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
247,138
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
429,737
HypeRank:
91,709
SEMrush Rank:
1,907,677
SimilarWeb Rank:
41,196
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
88.24%
Referral:
1.05%
Search:
10.64%
Social:
0.02%
Paid:
0.04%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
9.39%
Mobile:
90.61%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

519.6K
FEB
485.3K
MAR
425.4K
APR

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 30.07%
 
Germany 20.59%
 
United Kingdom 17.73%
 
Canada 9.13%
 
France 6.31%

Where do visitors go on nofile.org?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
nofile.org
100.00%100.00%2.4

Which sites are competitors to nofile.org?

Websites similar to nofile.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 40 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with nofile.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
13,300
Bing Index:
2,810
Baidu Index:
1

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  nofile.org
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  1,907,677
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  114
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  376
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $140.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $1.4K per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $41.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $510.2K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $1.7M.

How much would nofile.org make?

Daily Revenue:
$1,397.74
Monthly Revenue:
$41,932.20
Yearly Revenue:
$510,175.10
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 121,343$586.09
 
Canada 36,855$222.61
 
United Kingdom 71,546$191.74
 
Germany 83,107$116.35
 
France 25,451$14.76

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$227.19
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$6,815.73
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$82,924.68
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
69,404
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
2,082,107
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
25,332,307

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 21,842$105.50
 
Canada 9,214$55.65
 
Germany 24,101$33.74
 
United Kingdom 11,447$30.68
 
France 2,800$1.62

How much is nofile.org worth?

Website Value:
$1.7M

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
nofile.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
nofile.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
nofile.org
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2023-04-06 03:27:28
Enforcement:
(Chrome is preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs. You should fix the violations and submit your site for a review.)
On
EnforcementTime:
2023-04-06 03:27:28
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is nofile.org hosted? ▼

Nofile.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
46.166.189.98
ASN:
AS43350 
ISP:
NForce Entertainment B.V. 
Server Location:
Amsterdam
North Holland, NH
1091
The Netherlands, NL
 

Other sites hosted on 46.166.189.98

How fast does nofile.org load? ▼

The average loading time of nofile.org is 93 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
93 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 37% 50% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 50% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)48ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 85% 9% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 9% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 13% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)717ms 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 17% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)875ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)32ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)894ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 37% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 33% 53% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 53% 12% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 12%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 74% 19% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 19% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)163ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 80% 10% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 10% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 81% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 6% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 11%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)747ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)915ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 0%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)93ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 89% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 4%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)958ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Use efficient cache lifetimes  
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
3rd parties  
3rd party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of 3rd party code
Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Legacy JavaScript  
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 1.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Duplicated JavaScript  
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining

Does nofile.org use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on nofile.org are reduced by 71%.
nofile.org use br compression.
Original size: 4.84 KB
Compressed size: 1.38 KB
File reduced by: 3.46 KB (71%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. nofile.org has 80 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  80
Safety Confidence:
  51

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. nofile.org supports HTTPS.
 nofile.org supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: pixeldrain.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: E5
Valid from: Apr 14 16:53:31 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 13 16:53:30 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: E5
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 nofile.org does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Server: nginx
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 10:04:16 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.33
location: http://pixeldrain.com

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Location: https://pixeldrain.com/
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:38:52 GMT
Content-Length: 58

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:38:52 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 46.166.189.98 1476

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 28, 2019 and will expire on June 28, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Internet Domain Service BS Corp. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on May 25, 2025.
Domain Created:
2019-06-28
Domain Expires:
2025-06-28
Domain Updated:
2025-05-25
Domain Age:
6 years 20 days
Domain Registrar:
Internet Domain Service BS Corp
Domain Owner:
Whois Privacy Corp.
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: nofile.org
Registry Domain ID: da1f45c531cc429c846d3111fca8ce8b-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: http://whois.internet.bs
Registrar URL: http://www.internet.bs
Updated Date: 2025-05-25T08:09:19Z
Creation Date: 2019-06-28T20:18:33Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-06-28T20:18:33Z
Registrar: Internet Domain Service BS Corp
Registrar IANA ID: 2487
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.68949396928
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED
Registrant Name: REDACTED
Registrant Organization: Whois Privacy Corp.
Registrant Street: REDACTED
Registrant City: REDACTED
Registrant State/Province: New Providence
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED
Registrant Country: BS
Registrant Phone: REDACTED
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Fax: REDACTED
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED
Registrant Email: REDACTED
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED
Admin Name: REDACTED
Admin Organization: REDACTED
Admin Street: REDACTED
Admin City: REDACTED
Admin State/Province: REDACTED
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED
Admin Country: REDACTED
Admin Phone: REDACTED
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED
Admin Fax: REDACTED
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED
Admin Email: REDACTED
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED
Tech Name: REDACTED
Tech Organization: REDACTED
Tech Street: REDACTED
Tech City: REDACTED
Tech State/Province: REDACTED
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED
Tech Country: REDACTED
Tech Phone: REDACTED
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED
Tech Fax: REDACTED
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED
Tech Email: REDACTED
Name Server: ns-canada.topdns.com
Name Server: ns-uk.topdns.com
Name Server: ns-usa.topdns.com
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-06-06T06:14:55Z