File.garden
File Garden
Domain Summary
What is the traffic rank for File.garden?
• File.garden ranks #559,522 globally on HypeStat.
What percent of global Internet users visit File.garden?
• 0.000213% of global Internet users visit File.garden
How many people visit File.garden each day?
• File.garden receives approximately 10.5K visitors and 85,507 page impressions per day.
Which countries does File.garden receive most of its visitors from?
• File.garden is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Canada.
How much File.garden can earn?
• File.garden should earn about $372.49/day from advertising revenue.
What is File.garden estimated value?
• Estimated value of File.garden is $376,447.97.
What IP addresses does File.garden resolve to?
• File.garden resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 104.21.96.1.
Where are File.garden servers located in?
• File.garden has servers located in United States.
file.garden Profile

What technologies does file.garden use?
These are the technologies used at file.garden. file.garden has a total of 7 technologies installed in 3 different categories.file.garden Traffic Analysis
File.garden is ranked #559,522 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 10.5K visitors daily, generating a total of 85.5K pageviews. This equates to about 318.2K monthly visitors. File.garden traffic has increased by 11.3% compared to last month.Daily Visitors10.5K
13.61%
Monthly Visits318.2K
11.3%
Pages per Visit8.14
21.76%
Visit duration02:33
11.93%
Bounce Rate43.47%
16.07%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
- Daily Unique Visitors:
- 10,502
- Monthly Visits:
- 318,211
- Pages per Visit:
- 8.14
- Daily Pageviews:
- 85,507
- Avg. visit duration:
- 02:33
- Bounce rate:
- 43.47%
- Global Reach:
- 0.000213%
- Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
- 203,230
- Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
- 145,307
- Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
- 311,952
- HypeRank:
- 559,522
- SEMrush Rank:
- 14,538,079
- SimilarWeb Rank:
- 92,286
Traffic sources
- Direct:
- 70.63%
- Referral:
- 26.71%
- Search:
- 0.87%
- Social:
- 1.79%
- Paid:
- 0%
Desktop vs Mobile
- Desktop:
- 47.42%
- Mobile:
- 52.58%
Total Visits Last 3 Months
234.8K
FEB
285.9K
MAR
318.2K
APR
Visitors by country
- Country
- Users%
- United States 67.59%
- United Kingdom 9.67%
- Canada 5.29%
- Brazil 3.42%
- France 3.00%
Backlinks Report ▼
File.garden has a total of 60,514 backlinks from 965 referring domains and most of them comes from United States.- Total Backlinks:
- 60,514
- Follow Links:
- n/a
- Nofollow Links:
- n/a
- Referring Domains:
- 965
- Referring IPs:
- 1,041
- Authority Domain Score:
- 22
Backlinks by country
- Country
- Domains
- United States 343
- Germany 62
- France 42
- United Kingdom 20
- Russian Federation 19
Backlinks by TLDs
- TLD Distribution
- Domains
- .com
- 381
- .net
- 75
- .co
- 73
- .edu
- 2
- .gov
- 0
Which sites are competitors to file.garden?
Websites similar to file.garden are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.- Domain
- CompareDaily Visitors
- twitch.tv
- Compare >40M
- roblox.com
- Compare >22.2M
- steamcommunity.com
- Compare >6M
- filegarden.com
- Compare >11.6K
Last update was 81 days ago
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with file.garden in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.
Search Engine Indexes ▼
Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.- Google Index:
- 514
▼
SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.- Domain:
- file.garden
- Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic) - 14,538,079
- Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP) - 18
- Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results) - 0
- Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords) - $0.00
Revenue report ▼
Google.com would generate approximately $372.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $11.2K and annual gross revenue of approximately $136K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $376.4K.How much would file.garden make?
- Daily Revenue:
- $372.49
- Monthly Revenue:
- $11,174.70
- Yearly Revenue:
- $135,958.85
Daily earning by country
- CountryPageviewsEarning
- United States 57,791$279.13
- Canada 4,523$27.32
- United Kingdom 8,266$22.15
- Brazil 2,921$3.88
- France 2,565$1.49
Loss of money due to Adblock?
- Daily Revenue Loss:
- $61.02
- Monthly Revenue Loss:
- $1,830.46
- Yearly Revenue Loss:
- $22,270.58
- Daily Pageviews Blocked:
- 13,313
- Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
- 399,400
- Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
- 4,859,368
Daily revenue loss by country
- CountryBlockedLost Money
- United States 10,402$50.24
- Canada 1,131$6.83
- United Kingdom 1,323$3.54
- Brazil 175$0.23
- France 282$0.16
How much is file.garden worth?
- Website Value:
- $376.4K
Ad Experience Report ▼
Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.Mobile summary
- Root domain:
- file.garden
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Desktop summary
- Root domain:
- file.garden
- Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.) - Not reviewed
Abusive Experience Report ▼
Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.- Root domain:
- file.garden
- Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.) - Off
- Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.) - Not reviewed
Where is file.garden hosted? ▼
File.garden may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.- Server IP:
- 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 104.21.96.1
- ASN:
- AS13335
- ISP:
- Cloudflare Inc
- Server Location:
United States, US
Other sites hosted on 104.21.96.1
How fast does file.garden load? ▼
The average loading time of file.garden is 8092 ms. The Desktop speed index is 97 and mobile speed index is 77.- Average Load Time:
- 8092 ms
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)563ms
First Contentful Paint (FCP)958ms
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)44ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)408ms
First Contentful Paint (FCP)782ms
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)66ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s
Lab Data
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint 1.0 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 1.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Duplicated JavaScript
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Legacy JavaScript
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile
Field Data
Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)688ms
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.3s
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)273ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s
Origin Data
All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms
Time To First Byte (TTFB)468ms
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s
First Input Delay (FID)0
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)318ms
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s
Lab Data
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Contentful Paint 3.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Duplicated JavaScript
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Remove large, duplicate JavaScript modules from bundles to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity.
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Legacy JavaScript
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
Polyfills and transforms enable legacy browsers to use new JavaScript features. However, many aren't necessary for modern browsers. Consider modifying your JavaScript build process to not transpile features, unless you know you must support legacy browsers. Baseline Learn why most sites can deploy ES6+ code without transpiling
INP by phase
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Largest Contentful Paint 4.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Time to Interactive 4.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Improve image delivery
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Speed Index 3.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Does file.garden use compression? ▼
Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on file.garden are reduced by 70%.
file.garden use br compression.
Original size: 4.74 KB
Compressed size: 1.41 KB
File reduced by: 3.33 KB (70%)
Compressed size: 1.41 KB
File reduced by: 3.33 KB (70%)
Google Safe Browsing ▼
Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious
MyWot.com Reputation Ratings
MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. file.garden has 80 Safety Reputations.- Status:
- SAFE
- Safety Reputations:
- 80
- Safety Confidence:
- 51
SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼
An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. file.garden supports HTTPS. file.garden supports HTTPS
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: filegarden.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Apr 30 13:52:52 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 29 14:51:05 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Apr 30 13:52:52 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jul 29 14:51:05 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼
HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency. file.garden supports HTTP/2
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...
Http Header ▼
HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:14:06 GMT
content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
content-length: 45
location: https://filegarden.com/
server: cloudflare
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
cf-ray: 941467e9ed94000b-ORD
x-powered-by: Express
vary: Accept, Accept-Encoding
cf-cache-status: BYPASS
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=weY4Gv885cqsn3wF8v4b%2BPrHMpOSNkdrd5I459JuhlV1%2BTPjbuxmwxtx626uE8jhAoe%2BN9Nf26QseOREAGGZEis2zJN%2Fny%2FmMLvhZQA5ggHQcdNsm5pmpOWyw6eAmQ%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=7546&min_rtt=2177&rtt_var=11167&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3410&recv_bytes=891&delivery_rate=1330271&cwnd=113&unsent_bytes=0&cid=ea230402f61dc17b&ts=110&x=0"
HTTP/2 200
date: Sat, 17 May 2025 16:14:14 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
cf-ray: 941467eacbf3ab71-ORD
server: cloudflare
content-encoding: br
x-powered-by: ServeCube
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
vary: Origin
allow: OPTIONS, GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=P%2BFs9j6bcAiDvFxL7gML6pBEejbpFoUwyoRIixwosDnjGwIBxPpKtkR2q9x8x7WK5Vu%2F9w3ba3qQPNm8hmAByCNWmTcvrt6zA6QYCbU7wskoEvz63xyevqpodDCenNstjQ%3D%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=7567&min_rtt=2177&rtt_var=11221&sent=8&recv=11&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3419&recv_bytes=893&delivery_rate=1302158&cwnd=254&unsent_bytes=0&cid=68b1483bab83e2d7&ts=7950&x=0"
DNS Lookup ▼
DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.Type | Ip | Target/Txt | TTL |
AAAA | 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001 | 238 | |
AAAA | 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001 | 238 | |
AAAA | 2606:4700:3030::6815:7001 | 238 | |
AAAA | 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001 | 238 | |
AAAA | 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001 | 238 | |
AAAA | 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001 | 238 | |
AAAA | 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001 | 238 | |
A | 104.21.80.1 | 238 | |
A | 104.21.112.1 | 238 | |
A | 104.21.48.1 | 238 | |
A | 104.21.32.1 | 238 | |
A | 104.21.64.1 | 238 | |
A | 104.21.16.1 | 238 | |
A | 104.21.96.1 | 238 | |
NS | 3538 | ||
NS | 3538 | ||
HINFO | 3600 |
Whois Lookup ▼
Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 15, 2022 and will expire on February 15, 2027 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Porkbun. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 18, 2025.- Domain Created:
- 2022-02-15
- Domain Expires:
- 2027-02-15
- Domain Updated:
- 2025-02-18
- Domain Age:
- 3 years 5 months 20 days
- Domain Registrar:
- Porkbun
- Domain Owner:
- REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
- WhoIs:
Domain Name: file.garden Registry Domain ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrar WHOIS Server: https://porkbun.com/whois Registrar URL: www.porkbun.com Updated Date: 2025-02-18T23:50:50Z Creation Date: 2022-02-15T12:12:51Z Registry Expiry Date: 2027-02-15T12:12:51Z Registrar: Porkbun Registrar IANA ID: 1861 Registrar Abuse Contact Email:Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.5038508351 Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Organization: Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant State/Province: Michigan Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Country: US Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name. Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name. Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name. Name Server: eva.ns.cloudflare.com Name Server: nick.ns.cloudflare.com DNSSEC: signedDelegation URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/ >>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-05-17T16:15:08Z