betterme-fitness-coaching.com Betterme-fitness-coaching.com

   
BetterMe

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Betterme-fitness-coaching.com?

• Betterme-fitness-coaching.com ranks #1,189,836 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Betterme-fitness-coaching.com?

0.0001236% of global Internet users visit Betterme-fitness-coaching.com

How many people visit Betterme-fitness-coaching.com each day?

• Betterme-fitness-coaching.com receives approximately 6.1K visitors and 15,061 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Betterme-fitness-coaching.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Betterme-fitness-coaching.com is mostly visited by people located in United States,United Kingdom,Poland.

How much Betterme-fitness-coaching.com can earn?

• Betterme-fitness-coaching.com should earn about $48.28/day from advertising revenue.

What is Betterme-fitness-coaching.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Betterme-fitness-coaching.com is $42,287.92.

What IP addresses does Betterme-fitness-coaching.com resolve to?

• Betterme-fitness-coaching.com resolves to the IP addresses 3.168.51.83.

Where are Betterme-fitness-coaching.com servers located in?

• Betterme-fitness-coaching.com has servers located in United States.

betterme-fitness-coaching.com Profile

Title:BetterMe Description:this personality quiz will tell you what is the best diet and workout plan for you.
Category:Food and Drink / Groceries

What technologies does betterme-fitness-coaching.com use?

These are the technologies used at betterme-fitness-coaching.com. betterme-fitness-coaching.com has a total of 13 technologies installed in 10 different categories.

betterme-fitness-coaching.com Traffic Analysis

Betterme-fitness-coaching.com is ranked #1,189,836 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 6.1K visitors daily, generating a total of 15.1K pageviews. This equates to about 184.6K monthly visitors. Betterme-fitness-coaching.com traffic has decreased by 1.35% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors6.1K
0.23%
Monthly Visits184.6K
1.35%
Pages per Visit2.47
61.4%
Visit duration02:28
0.57%
Bounce Rate57.88%
18.89%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
6,092
Monthly Visits:
184,588
Pages per Visit:
2.47
Daily Pageviews:
15,061
Avg. visit duration:
02:28
Bounce rate:
57.88%
Global Reach:
0.0001236%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
104,090
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
88,137
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
184,608
HypeRank:
1,189,836
SimilarWeb Rank:
238,317
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
97.54%
Referral:
0.97%
Search:
0.55%
Social:
0.94%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
24.72%
Mobile:
75.28%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

96.1K
NOV
187.1K
DEC
184.6K
JAN

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 36.19%
 
United Kingdom 22.33%
 
Poland 15.81%
 
Japan 10.75%
 
Canada 7.57%

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  betterme-fitness-coaching.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Which sites are competitors to betterme-fitness-coaching.com?

Websites similar to betterme-fitness-coaching.com are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
fasteasy.io
Compare >119.3K
hellofresh.de
Compare >70.1K
Last update was 463 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with betterme-fitness-coaching.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1

Revenue report

betterme-fitness-coaching.com would generate approximately $48.3 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.4K and annual gross revenue of approximately $17.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $42.3K.

How much would betterme-fitness-coaching.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$48.28
Monthly Revenue:
$1,448.40
Yearly Revenue:
$17,622.20
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 5,451$26.33
 
United Kingdom 3,363$9.01
 
Canada 1,141$6.89
 
Poland 2,381$0.95
 
Japan 1,619$0.58

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$8.24
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$247.07
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$3,005.97
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
2,639
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
79,161
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
963,129

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 981$4.74
 
Canada 285$1.72
 
United Kingdom 538$1.44
 
Poland 786$0.31
 
Japan 49$0.02

How much is betterme-fitness-coaching.com worth?

Website Value:
$42.3K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
betterme-fitness-coaching.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
betterme-fitness-coaching.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
betterme-fitness-coaching.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is betterme-fitness-coaching.com hosted?

Betterme-fitness-coaching.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
3.168.51.83
ASN:
 
ISP:
 
Server Location:

United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 3.168.51.83

How fast does betterme-fitness-coaching.com load?

The average loading time of betterme-fitness-coaching.com is 54 ms. The Desktop speed index is 52 and mobile speed index is 51.
Average Load Time:
54 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

52
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48% 41% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 41% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 74% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)124ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.7s 45% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 45% 33% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 33% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 48% 41% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 41% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.8s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 74% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)124ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.7s 45% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 45% 33% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 33% 21% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 4.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 2.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 200 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Total Blocking Time 520 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Time to Interactive 4.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 0.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

51
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 48% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 49% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 49% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 74% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)242ms 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 63% 32% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 32% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.2s 45% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 34% 37% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 37% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 28%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 39% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39% 49% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 49% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 69% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 69% 22% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 22% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)242ms 63% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 63% 32% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 32% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)4.2s 34% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 34% 37% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 37% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 28%

Lab Data

Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Time to Interactive 22.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 7.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint 22.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 230 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 660 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Contentful Paint 1.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs

Does betterme-fitness-coaching.com use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on betterme-fitness-coaching.com are reduced by 64%.
betterme-fitness-coaching.com use gzip compression.
Original size: 20.41 KB
Compressed size: 7.17 KB
File reduced by: 13.25 KB (64%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  NOT_SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. betterme-fitness-coaching.com supports HTTPS.
 betterme-fitness-coaching.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: betterme-fitness-coaching.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid from: Oct 28 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Nov 26 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:25:30 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:25:30 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 betterme-fitness-coaching.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 23:44:42 GMT
content-encoding: gzip
x-powered-by: Next.js
set-cookie: flow=1453; Max-Age=86400; Path=/
set-cookie: flow=3132; Max-Age=86400; Path=/
cache-control: private, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
etag: "oh0o54zqgag4h"
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-cache: Miss from cloudfront
via: 1.1 a10cec448fae641ceeeb2e78be14b3ba.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
x-amz-cf-pop: ORD58-P9
x-amz-cf-id: STfkwSMC7qbxpfdAwTcXdors9ScQs128-7_WRWWkp8mSHmhVy7woFQ==
x-content-type-options: nosniff
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains

DNS Lookup

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 900
Mname ns-1297.awsdns-34.org
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 3.168.51.54 5
A 3.168.51.83 5
A 3.168.51.56 5
A 3.168.51.94 5
NS ns-1297.awsdns-34.org 172745
NS ns-85.awsdns-10.com 172745
NS ns-744.awsdns-29.net 172745
NS ns-1571.awsdns-04.co.uk 172745

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on February 1, 2023 and will expire on February 1, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar https://www.101domain.com/. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on December 4, 2024.
Domain Created:
2023-02-01
Domain Expires:
2026-02-01
Domain Updated:
2024-12-04
Domain Age:
3 years 4 months 10 days
Domain Registrar:
https://www.101domain.com/
Domain Owner:
Digital Privacy Corporation
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: BETTERME-FITNESS-COACHING.COM
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.101domain.com
Registrar URL: https://www.101domain.com/
Updated Date: 2024-12-04T00:10:09Z
Creation Date: 2023-02-01T11:02:59Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2026-02-01T11:02:59Z
Registrar: https://www.101domain.com/
Registrar IANA ID: 1011
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8582954626
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registrant Name: Private Registrant
Registrant Organization: Digital Privacy Corporation
Registrant Street:  3220 Executive Ridge Drive, Suite 101.
Registrant Street: C/O BETTERME-FITNESS-COACHING.COM
Registrant City: Vista
Registrant State/Province: CA
Registrant Postal Code: 92081
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.7604482392
Registrant Phone Ext: 
Registrant Fax: 
Registrant Fax Ext: 
Registrant Email: email
Admin Name: Private Registrant
Admin Organization: Digital Privacy Corporation
Admin Street:  3220 Executive Ridge Drive, Suite 101.
Admin Street: C/O BETTERME-FITNESS-COACHING.COM
Admin City: Vista
Admin State/Province: CA
Admin Postal Code: 92081
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.7604482392
Admin Phone Ext: 
Admin Fax: 
Admin Fax Ext: 
Admin Email: email
Tech Name: Private Registrant
Tech Organization: Digital Privacy Corporation
Tech Street:  3220 Executive Ridge Drive, Suite 101.
Tech Street: C/O BETTERME-FITNESS-COACHING.COM
Tech City: Vista
Tech State/Province: CA
Tech Postal Code: 92081
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.7604482392
Tech Phone Ext: 
Tech Fax: 
Tech Fax Ext: 
Tech Email: email
Name Server: NS-1571.AWSDNS-04.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-744.AWSDNS-29.NET
Name Server: NS-85.AWSDNS-10.COM
Name Server: NS-1297.AWSDNS-34.ORG
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net
For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes-2014-06-16-en.
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2025-03-04T23:45:37Z